<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Missing Link</title>
	<atom:link href="http://craftingcontext.ca/2010/06/24/missing-link/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://craftingcontext.ca/2010/06/24/missing-link/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on business culture, self-awareness and anything else that comes to mind...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:51:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aurian</title>
		<link>http://craftingcontext.ca/2010/06/24/missing-link/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aurian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://craftingcontext.wordpress.com/?p=363#comment-75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those are really tough questions, John.  

I don&#039;t know that it is possible to prioritize, unless you are going to look at communication using a risk management approach.  If you use that method and analytically decide which interfaces could be the greatest influencers on your organization&#039;s success/failure, then maybe you can focus your efforts on how to best get value for your communication training budget.

The idea fascinates me, because communication is essential at every level of an organization.  As you mentioned, implementation of this throughout an organization cannot be the responsibility of one person or team.  So how do we effectively enable better inherent communications across the board without it being some lip-service training program that people forget a month later?

Thanks so much for commenting.  You&#039;ve certainly got me thinking about the best method of focusing communication efforts!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are really tough questions, John.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that it is possible to prioritize, unless you are going to look at communication using a risk management approach.  If you use that method and analytically decide which interfaces could be the greatest influencers on your organization&#8217;s success/failure, then maybe you can focus your efforts on how to best get value for your communication training budget.</p>
<p>The idea fascinates me, because communication is essential at every level of an organization.  As you mentioned, implementation of this throughout an organization cannot be the responsibility of one person or team.  So how do we effectively enable better inherent communications across the board without it being some lip-service training program that people forget a month later?</p>
<p>Thanks so much for commenting.  You&#8217;ve certainly got me thinking about the best method of focusing communication efforts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Vasko</title>
		<link>http://craftingcontext.ca/2010/06/24/missing-link/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Vasko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://craftingcontext.wordpress.com/?p=363#comment-74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proper communication always seems to be the missing link and no matter how many ways we have to communicate with one another, it always comes down to whether people know or don&#039;t know how to communicate and which methods to use. And what you mentioned about people leaving companies and companies trying to use one person to do that job of many also adds to the difficulty. How does one prioritize? Who should be communicated with first?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proper communication always seems to be the missing link and no matter how many ways we have to communicate with one another, it always comes down to whether people know or don&#8217;t know how to communicate and which methods to use. And what you mentioned about people leaving companies and companies trying to use one person to do that job of many also adds to the difficulty. How does one prioritize? Who should be communicated with first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

